stallman vs geohot on software licensing

## Stallman vs. Geohot on Software Licensing **Richard Stallman** and **George Hotz (geohot)** represent two very different philosophies on software licensing and user freedom. ### Stallman's Philosophy - Stallman is the founder of the free software movement and the main author of the GNU General Public License (GPL)[2][5]. - He advocates for "free software," meaning software that gives users the freedom to use, study, modify, and distribute code. - Stallman pioneered the concept of **copyleft**, which uses copyright law to ensure these freedoms are preserved for all users and downstream developers[2][5]. - He is critical of proprietary software, restrictive licenses, DRM, and anything that limits user control or modification of software[2][5]. - For Stallman, the ethical imperative is user freedom, and the GPL enforces this by requiring derivative works to also be free and open[2][5]. ### Geohot's Perspective - George Hotz (geohot) is known for jailbreaking the iPhone and hacking the PlayStation 3, often in direct opposition to restrictive software and hardware licensing. - While not represented in the search results directly, geohot’s actions and public statements indicate a more pragmatic, hacker-centric view: he values the right to tinker, reverse-engineer, and bypass restrictions, but does not necessarily advocate for strict copyleft or "free software" in Stallman's sense. - Geohot has released code under permissive licenses (like MIT or BSD) and has sometimes criticized the GPL for being too restrictive or ideological, preferring licenses that maximize developer freedom—including the freedom to make software proprietary. ### Comparison Table | Aspect | Richard Stallman (GPL) | Geohot (Permissive/Hacker) | |-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------| | Core Value | User freedom (use, study, modify, share) | Developer freedom, right to tinker | | License Preference | Copyleft (GPL) | Permissive (MIT, BSD) | | View on Proprietary SW | Strongly opposed | Opposes restrictions, but less ideological| | Redistribution Rules | Derivatives must remain free/open | Derivatives can be closed or open | | Attitude Toward DRM | Actively fights DRM, calls it "digital restrictions" | Breaks DRM, but less focus on licensing | ### Key Differences - **Stallman** wants to guarantee freedom for all users, even at the cost of limiting what developers can do with the code (e.g., can't make it proprietary)[2][5]. - **Geohot** is more focused on breaking barriers and enabling hacking and reverse engineering, even if that means someone could take his code and make it closed-source. ### Summary Stallman’s approach is about protecting user freedoms through strong copyleft licensing (GPL), ensuring software remains free for everyone down the chain[2][5]. Geohot’s approach is more about enabling individual freedom to hack, tinker, and bypass restrictions, often favoring permissive licenses that allow maximum flexibility—even if that means the code could become proprietary. This reflects a fundamental divide: Stallman’s ethics-driven, community-focused model vs. geohot’s pragmatic, hacker-centric ethos. [1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

Ed Latimore

Masanobu Fukuoka was born in 1914 in a small farming village on the island of Shikoku in Southern Japan. He was educated in microbiology and worked as a soil scientist specializing in plant pathology, but at the age of twenty-five he began to have doubts about the "wonders of modern agriculture science." While recovering from a severe attack of pneumonia, Fukuoka experienced a moment of satori or personal enlightenment. He had a vision in which something one might call true nature was revealed to him. He saw that all the "accomplishments" of human civilization are meaningless before the totality of nature. He saw that humans had become separated from nature and that our attempts to control or even understand all the complexities of life were not only futile, they were self-destructive. From that moment on, he has spent his life trying to return to the state of being one with nature. At the time of his revelation, Fukuoka was living in a Japan that was abandoning its traditional farming methods and adopting Western agriculture, economic and industrial models. He saw how this trend was driving the Japanese even further from a oneness with nature, and how destructive and polluting those practices were. As a result, he resigned his job as a research scientist and returned to his father's farm on Shikoku determined to demonstrate the practical value of his vision by restoring the land to a condition that would enable nature's original harmony to prevail. Through 30 years of refinement he was able to develop a "do-nothing" method of farming. Without soil cultivation such as plowing or tilling, chemical fertilizers, pesticides, weeding, pruning, machinery or compost, Fukuoka was able to produce high-quality fruit, vegetables and grains with yields equal to or greater than those of any neighboring farm. In his 60's, Fukuoka sat down to document what he had seen and done. In 1975 his first book "One Straw Revolution" was released and has had a profound impact on agriculture and human consciousness all over the world. "One Straw Revolution" was followed by "The Natural Way of Farming" and then by "The Road Back To Nature." Since 1979, Fukuoka has been touring, giving lectures and sowing the seeds of natural farming all over the world. In 1988 he was given Deshikottan Award, and the Ramon Magsaysay Award. In 1997 he received the Earth Council Award. from

(less)

My net worth is $4M but I choose to live in my car

Unemployment Beats Having A Lousy Job

An old farmer on his deathbed called for his two sons+. He told them that while his farm did not produce much, there was a valuable treasure buried in it which they would discover as they plowed the fields. He then left them each half his farm, and his blessing. When the old man had passed on, the two sons began working in the fields. They worked hard, from morning to night, but never found a brass farthing. Then, when the harvest came, it was bountiful. Their old father had told them the truth - the treasure buried in the land was its fertility, and their hard work had uncovered it! But everyone wants to believe a get-rich-quick scheme, and the two sons were no exception. They worked twice as hard as before, still hoping to find the treasure. When they found nothing, they began borrowing money to buy the land from each other. They started importing expensive tools to help them dig faster. Eventually, the clamor of creditors made them face the hard truth - they had been wasting their time. And so they fell into a great depression. + I'm tempted to say it was three, and give the youngest a cat, a pair of boots, and a sack; but that's really another story.

TAOISM | The Power of Letting Go