logo

Modern Day Parable A Japanese company (Toyota) and an American company (General Motors) decided to have a canoe race on the Missouri River.  Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their peak  performance before the race. On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile . The Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate the reason for the crushing defeat.  A management team made up of senior management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action. Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people paddling and 1 person steering, while the American team had 7 people steering and 2 people paddling. Feeling a deeper study was in order, American management hired a consulting company and paid them a large amount of money for a second opinion. They advised, of course, that too many people were steering the boat, while not enough people were paddling. Not sure of how to utilize that information, but wanting to prevent another loss to the Japanese, the paddling team's management structure was totally reorganized to 4 steering supervisors, 2 area steering superintendents and 1 assistant superintendent steering manager. They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 2 people paddling the boat greater incentive to work harder.  It was called the 'Rowing Team Quality First Program, with meetings, dinners and free pens for the paddlers.  There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes and other equipment, extra vacation days for practices, and bonuses.  The pension program was trimmed to 'equal the competition' and some of the resultant savings were channeled into morale boosting programs and teamwork posters. The next year the Japanese won by two miles. Humiliated, the American management laid off one paddler, halted development of a new canoe , sold all the paddles, and cancelled all capital investments for new equipment.  The money saved was distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses. The next year, try as he might, the lone designated paddler was unable to even finish the race (having no paddles), so he was laid off for unacceptable performance, all canoe equipment was sold and the next year's racing team was out-sourced to India. Sadly, the End. Here's something else to think about: GM has spent the last thirty years moving all its factories out of the US claiming they can't make money paying American wages. TOYOTA has spent the last thirty years building more than a dozen plants inside the US .   The last quarter's results: TOYOTA makes 4 billion in profits while GM racks up 9 billion in losses !!! GM folks are still scratching their heads, and collecting bonuses...

https://www.landracing.com/forum/index.php?topic=17039.0

Unemployment Beats Having A Lousy Job

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2894056

An old farmer on his deathbed called for his two sons+. He told them that while his farm did not produce much, there was a valuable treasure buried in it which they would discover as they plowed the fields. He then left them each half his farm, and his blessing. When the old man had passed on, the two sons began working in the fields. They worked hard, from morning to night, but never found a brass farthing. Then, when the harvest came, it was bountiful. Their old father had told them the truth - the treasure buried in the land was its fertility, and their hard work had uncovered it! But everyone wants to believe a get-rich-quick scheme, and the two sons were no exception. They worked twice as hard as before, still hoping to find the treasure. When they found nothing, they began borrowing money to buy the land from each other. They started importing expensive tools to help them dig faster. Eventually, the clamor of creditors made them face the hard truth - they had been wasting their time. And so they fell into a great depression. + I'm tempted to say it was three, and give the youngest a cat, a pair of boots, and a sack; but that's really another story.

Categorical imperative for dummies

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/Categorical-imperative-for-CTie1II2Q.CUSSQJ0zddCw

The categorical imperative is a moral philosophy proposed by Immanuel Kant. It states that you should act in a way that the principle behind your action could become a universal law of nature.[1][4] In other words, you should act only in ways that you would will everyone else to act as well. The key aspects of the categorical imperative are: 1. Act only according to rules that you would want to become universal laws of nature. For example, you should not lie because if everyone lied, the concept of truth itself would be undermined.[1] 2. Treat humanity, including yourself, always as an end and never merely as a means. This means respecting the autonomy and dignity of all people and not exploiting or using them solely for your own purposes.[4] 3. Act according to rules that could govern a hypothetical "kingdom of ends" - a community of rational beings giving laws for their own behavior.[4] Essentially, the categorical imperative calls for moral universality - judging your actions by asking if it would be acceptable for everyone to act that way. It demands respect for rational beings and consistency in the moral rules you set for yourself and others.[1][4] The key benefit of the categorical imperative is that it provides an objective basis for morality based on reason and consistency, rather than subjective desires or cultural norms. However, critics argue it is too rigid and fails to account for nuances in moral dilemmas.[1] But overall, it remains one of the most influential ethical frameworks in modern philosophy. Citations: [1]

https://effectiviology.com/categorical-imperative/

[2]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bIys6JoEDw

[3]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQ2fvTvtzBM

[4]

https://open.library.okstate.edu/introphilosophy/chapter/a-brief-overview-of-kants-moral-theory/

[5]

https://owlcation.com/humanities/Immanuel-Kant-and-The-Categorical-Imperative

End of results